Add detailed landing page development plan in docs/frontend_landing_plan.md: - Complete landing page structure (Hero, Problem/Solution, Features, Demo, CTA) - Design guidelines from downloaded skills (typography, color, motion, composition) - Security considerations (XSS prevention, input sanitization, CSP) - Performance targets (LCP <2.5s, bundle <150KB, Lighthouse >90) - Responsiveness and accessibility requirements (WCAG 2.1 AA) - Success KPIs and monitoring setup - 3-week development timeline with daily tasks - Definition of Done checklist Download 10+ frontend/UI/UX skills via universal-skills-manager: - frontend-ui-ux: UI/UX design without mockups - frontend-design-guidelines: Production-grade interface guidelines - frontend-developer: React best practices (40+ rules) - frontend-engineer: Next.js 14 App Router patterns - ui-ux-master: Comprehensive design systems and accessibility - ui-ux-systems-designer: Information architecture and interaction - ui-ux-design-user-experience: Platform-specific guidelines - Plus additional reference materials and validation scripts Configure universal-skills MCP with SkillsMP API key for curated skill access. Safety first: All skills validated before installation, no project code modified. Refs: Universal Skills Manager (github:jacob-bd/universal-skills-manager) Next: Begin Sprint 3 landing page development
1.7 KiB
1.7 KiB
title, impact, impactDescription, tags
| title | impact | impactDescription | tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early Length Check for Array Comparisons | MEDIUM-HIGH | avoids expensive operations when lengths differ | javascript, arrays, performance, optimization, comparison |
Early Length Check for Array Comparisons
When comparing arrays with expensive operations (sorting, deep equality, serialization), check lengths first. If lengths differ, the arrays cannot be equal.
In real-world applications, this optimization is especially valuable when the comparison runs in hot paths (event handlers, render loops).
Incorrect (always runs expensive comparison):
function hasChanges(current: string[], original: string[]) {
// Always sorts and joins, even when lengths differ
return current.sort().join() !== original.sort().join()
}
Two O(n log n) sorts run even when current.length is 5 and original.length is 100. There is also overhead of joining the arrays and comparing the strings.
Correct (O(1) length check first):
function hasChanges(current: string[], original: string[]) {
// Early return if lengths differ
if (current.length !== original.length) {
return true
}
// Only sort/join when lengths match
const currentSorted = current.toSorted()
const originalSorted = original.toSorted()
for (let i = 0; i < currentSorted.length; i++) {
if (currentSorted[i] !== originalSorted[i]) {
return true
}
}
return false
}
This new approach is more efficient because:
- It avoids the overhead of sorting and joining the arrays when lengths differ
- It avoids consuming memory for the joined strings (especially important for large arrays)
- It avoids mutating the original arrays
- It returns early when a difference is found