mockupAWS/docs/SECURITY-AUDIT-v1.0.0.md

# Security Audit Plan - mockupAWS v1.0.0

> **Version:** 1.0.0  
> **Author:** @spec-architect  
> **Date:** 2026-04-07  
> **Status:** DRAFT - Ready for Security Team Review  
> **Classification:** Internal - Confidential  

---

## Executive Summary

This document outlines the comprehensive security audit plan for mockupAWS v1.0.0 production release. The audit covers OWASP Top 10 review, penetration testing, compliance verification, and vulnerability remediation.

### Audit Scope

| Component | Coverage | Priority |
|-----------|----------|----------|
| Backend API (FastAPI) | Full | P0 |
| Frontend (React) | Full | P0 |
| Database (PostgreSQL) | Full | P0 |
| Infrastructure (Docker/AWS) | Full | P1 |
| Third-party Dependencies | Full | P0 |

### Timeline

| Phase | Duration | Start Date | End Date |
|-------|----------|------------|----------|
| Preparation | 3 days | Week 1 Day 1 | Week 1 Day 3 |
| Automated Scanning | 5 days | Week 1 Day 4 | Week 2 Day 1 |
| Manual Penetration Testing | 10 days | Week 2 Day 2 | Week 3 Day 4 |
| Remediation | 7 days | Week 3 Day 5 | Week 4 Day 4 |
| Verification | 3 days | Week 4 Day 5 | Week 4 Day 7 |

---

## 1. Security Checklist

### 1.1 OWASP Top 10 Review

#### A01:2021 - Broken Access Control

| Check Item | Status | Method | Owner |
|------------|--------|--------|-------|
| Verify JWT token validation on all protected endpoints | ⬜ | Code Review | Security Team |
| Check for direct object reference vulnerabilities | ⬜ | Pen Test | Security Team |
| Verify CORS configuration is restrictive | ⬜ | Config Review | DevOps |
| Test role-based access control (RBAC) enforcement | ⬜ | Pen Test | Security Team |
| Verify API key scope enforcement | ⬜ | Unit Test | Backend Dev |
| Check for privilege escalation paths | ⬜ | Pen Test | Security Team |
| Verify rate limiting per user/API key | ⬜ | Automated Test | QA |

**Testing Methodology:**
```bash
# JWT Token Manipulation Tests
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer INVALID_TOKEN" https://api.mockupaws.com/scenarios
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer EXPIRED_TOKEN" https://api.mockupaws.com/scenarios

# IDOR Tests
curl https://api.mockupaws.com/scenarios/OTHER_USER_SCENARIO_ID

# Privilege Escalation
curl -X POST https://api.mockupaws.com/admin/users -H "Authorization: Bearer REGULAR_USER_TOKEN"
```

#### A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures

| Check Item | Status | Method | Owner |
|------------|--------|--------|-------|
| Verify TLS 1.3 minimum for all communications | ⬜ | SSL Labs Scan | DevOps |
| Check password hashing (bcrypt cost >= 12) | ✅ | Code Review | Done |
| Verify JWT algorithm is HS256 or RS256 (not none) | ✅ | Code Review | Done |
| Check API key storage (hashed, not encrypted) | ✅ | Code Review | Done |
| Verify secrets are not in source code | ⬜ | GitLeaks Scan | Security Team |
| Check for weak cipher suites | ⬜ | SSL Labs Scan | DevOps |
| Verify database encryption at rest | ⬜ | AWS Config Review | DevOps |

**Current Findings:**
- ✅ Password hashing: bcrypt with cost=12 (good)
- ✅ JWT Algorithm: HS256 (acceptable, consider RS256 for microservices)
- ✅ API Keys: SHA-256 hash stored (good)
- ⚠️ JWT Secret: Currently uses default in dev (MUST change in production)

#### A03:2021 - Injection

| Check Item | Status | Method | Owner |
|------------|--------|--------|-------|
| SQL Injection - Verify parameterized queries | ✅ | Code Review | Done |
| SQL Injection - Test with sqlmap | ⬜ | Automated Tool | Security Team |
| NoSQL Injection - Check MongoDB queries | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Command Injection - Check os.system calls | ⬜ | Code Review | Security Team |
| LDAP Injection - Not applicable | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XPath Injection - Not applicable | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| OS Injection - Verify input sanitization | ⬜ | Code Review | Security Team |

**SQL Injection Test Cases:**
```python
# Test payloads for sqlmap
payloads = [
    "' OR '1'='1",
    "'; DROP TABLE scenarios; --",
    "' UNION SELECT * FROM users --",
    "1' AND 1=1 --",
    "1' AND 1=2 --",
]
```

#### A04:2021 - Insecure Design

| Check Item | Status | Method | Owner |
|------------|--------|--------|-------|
| Verify secure design patterns are documented | ⬜ | Documentation Review | Architect |
| Check for business logic flaws | ⬜ | Pen Test | Security Team |
| Verify rate limiting on all endpoints | ⬜ | Code Review | Backend Dev |
| Check for race conditions | ⬜ | Code Review | Security Team |
| Verify proper error handling (no info leakage) | ⬜ | Code Review | Backend Dev |

#### A05:2021 - Security Misconfiguration

| Check Item | Status | Method | Owner |
|------------|--------|--------|-------|
| Verify security headers (HSTS, CSP, etc.) | ⬜ | HTTP Headers Scan | DevOps |
| Check for default credentials | ⬜ | Automated Scan | Security Team |
| Verify debug mode disabled in production | ⬜ | Config Review | DevOps |
| Check for exposed .env files | ⬜ | Web Scan | Security Team |
| Verify directory listing disabled | ⬜ | Web Scan | Security Team |
| Check for unnecessary features enabled | ⬜ | Config Review | DevOps |

**Security Headers Checklist:**
```http
Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
X-Frame-Options: DENY
X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block
Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'
Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=()
```

#### A06:2021 - Vulnerable and Outdated Components

| Check Item | Status | Method | Owner |
|------------|--------|--------|-------|
| Scan Python dependencies for CVEs | ⬜ | pip-audit/safety | Security Team |
| Scan Node.js dependencies for CVEs | ⬜ | npm audit | Security Team |
| Check Docker base images for vulnerabilities | ⬜ | Trivy Scan | DevOps |
| Verify dependency pinning in requirements | ⬜ | Code Review | Backend Dev |
| Check for end-of-life components | ⬜ | Automated Scan | Security Team |

**Dependency Scan Commands:**
```bash
# Python dependencies
pip-audit --requirement requirements.txt
safety check --file requirements.txt

# Node.js dependencies
cd frontend && npm audit --audit-level=moderate

# Docker images
trivy image mockupaws/backend:latest
trivy image postgres:15-alpine
```

#### A07:2021 - Identification and Authentication Failures

| Check Item | Status | Method | Owner |
|------------|--------|--------|-------|
| Verify password complexity requirements | ⬜ | Code Review | Backend Dev |
| Check for brute force protection | ⬜ | Pen Test | Security Team |
| Verify session timeout handling | ⬜ | Pen Test | Security Team |
| Check for credential stuffing protection | ⬜ | Code Review | Backend Dev |
| Verify MFA capability (if required) | ⬜ | Architecture Review | Architect |
| Check for weak password storage | ✅ | Code Review | Done |

#### A08:2021 - Software and Data Integrity Failures

| Check Item | Status | Method | Owner |
|------------|--------|--------|-------|
| Verify CI/CD pipeline security | ⬜ | Pipeline Review | DevOps |
| Check for signed commits requirement | ⬜ | Git Config Review | DevOps |
| Verify dependency integrity (checksums) | ⬜ | Build Review | DevOps |
| Check for unauthorized code changes | ⬜ | Audit Log Review | Security Team |

#### A09:2021 - Security Logging and Monitoring Failures

| Check Item | Status | Method | Owner |
|------------|--------|--------|-------|
| Verify audit logging for sensitive operations | ⬜ | Code Review | Backend Dev |
| Check for centralized log aggregation | ⬜ | Infra Review | DevOps |
| Verify log integrity (tamper-proof) | ⬜ | Config Review | DevOps |
| Check for real-time alerting | ⬜ | Monitoring Review | DevOps |
| Verify retention policies | ⬜ | Policy Review | Security Team |

**Required Audit Events:**
```python
AUDIT_EVENTS = [
    "user.login.success",
    "user.login.failure",
    "user.logout",
    "user.password_change",
    "api_key.created",
    "api_key.revoked",
    "scenario.created",
    "scenario.deleted",
    "scenario.started",
    "scenario.stopped",
    "report.generated",
    "export.downloaded",
]
```

#### A10:2021 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

| Check Item | Status | Method | Owner |
|------------|--------|--------|-------|
| Check for unvalidated URL redirects | ⬜ | Code Review | Security Team |
| Verify external API call validation | ⬜ | Code Review | Security Team |
| Check for internal resource access | ⬜ | Pen Test | Security Team |

---

### 1.2 Dependency Vulnerability Scan

#### Python Dependencies Scan

```bash
# Install scanning tools
pip install pip-audit safety bandit

# Generate full report
pip-audit --requirement requirements.txt --format=json --output=reports/python-audit.json

# High severity only
pip-audit --requirement requirements.txt --severity=high

# Safety check with API key for latest CVEs
safety check --file requirements.txt --json --output reports/safety-report.json

# Static analysis with Bandit
bandit -r src/ -f json -o reports/bandit-report.json
```

**Current Dependencies Status:**

| Package | Version | CVE Status | Action Required |
|---------|---------|------------|-----------------|
| fastapi | 0.110.0 | Check | Scan required |
| sqlalchemy | 2.0.x | Check | Scan required |
| pydantic | 2.7.0 | Check | Scan required |
| asyncpg | 0.31.0 | Check | Scan required |
| python-jose | 3.3.0 | Check | Scan required |
| bcrypt | 4.0.0 | Check | Scan required |

#### Node.js Dependencies Scan

```bash
cd frontend

# Audit with npm
npm audit --audit-level=moderate

# Generate detailed report
npm audit --json > ../reports/npm-audit.json

# Fix automatically where possible
npm audit fix

# Check for outdated packages
npm outdated
```

#### Docker Image Scan

```bash
# Scan all images
trivy image --format json --output reports/trivy-backend.json mockupaws/backend:latest
trivy image --format json --output reports/trivy-postgres.json postgres:15-alpine
trivy image --format json --output reports/trivy-nginx.json nginx:alpine

# Check for secrets in images
trivy filesystem --scanners secret src/
```

---

### 1.3 Secrets Management Audit

#### Current State Analysis

| Secret Type | Current Storage | Risk Level | Target Solution |
|-------------|-----------------|------------|-----------------|
| JWT Secret Key | .env file | HIGH | HashiCorp Vault |
| DB Password | .env file | HIGH | AWS Secrets Manager |
| API Keys | Database (hashed) | MEDIUM | Keep current |
| AWS Credentials | .env file | HIGH | IAM Roles |
| Redis Password | .env file | MEDIUM | Kubernetes Secrets |

#### Secrets Audit Checklist

- [ ] No secrets in Git history (`git log --all --full-history -- .env`)
- [ ] No secrets in Docker images (use multi-stage builds)
- [ ] Secrets rotated in last 90 days
- [ ] Secret access logged
- [ ] Least privilege for secret access
- [ ] Secrets encrypted at rest
- [ ] Secret rotation automation planned

#### Secret Scanning

```bash
# Install gitleaks
docker run --rm -v $(pwd):/code zricethezav/gitleaks detect --source=/code -v

# Scan for high-entropy strings
truffleHog --regex --entropy=False .

# Check specific patterns
grep -r "password\|secret\|key\|token" --include="*.py" --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" src/ frontend/src/
```

---

### 1.4 API Security Review

#### Rate Limiting Configuration

| Endpoint Category | Current Limit | Recommended | Implementation |
|-------------------|---------------|-------------|----------------|
| Authentication | 5/min | 5/min | Redis-backed |
| API Key Mgmt | 10/min | 10/min | Redis-backed |
| General API | 100/min | 100/min | Redis-backed |
| Ingest | 1000/min | 1000/min | Redis-backed |
| Reports | 10/min | 10/min | Redis-backed |

#### Rate Limiting Test Cases

```python
# Test rate limiting effectiveness
import asyncio
import httpx

async def test_rate_limit(endpoint: str, requests: int, expected_limit: int):
    """Verify rate limiting is enforced."""
    async with httpx.AsyncClient() as client:
        tasks = [client.get(endpoint) for _ in range(requests)]
        responses = await asyncio.gather(*tasks, return_exceptions=True)
        
    rate_limited = sum(1 for r in responses if r.status_code == 429)
    success = sum(1 for r in responses if r.status_code == 200)
    
    assert success <= expected_limit, f"Expected max {expected_limit} success, got {success}"
    assert rate_limited > 0, "Expected some rate limited requests"
```

#### Authentication Security

| Check | Method | Expected Result |
|-------|--------|-----------------|
| JWT without signature fails | Unit Test | 401 Unauthorized |
| JWT with wrong secret fails | Unit Test | 401 Unauthorized |
| Expired JWT fails | Unit Test | 401 Unauthorized |
| Token type confusion fails | Unit Test | 401 Unauthorized |
| Refresh token reuse detection | Pen Test | Old tokens invalidated |
| API key prefix validation | Unit Test | Fast rejection |
| API key rate limit per key | Load Test | Enforced |

---

### 1.5 Data Encryption Requirements

#### Encryption in Transit

| Protocol | Minimum Version | Configuration |
|----------|-----------------|---------------|
| TLS | 1.3 | `ssl_protocols TLSv1.3;` |
| HTTPS | HSTS | `max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains` |
| Database | SSL | `sslmode=require` |
| Redis | TLS | `tls-port 6380` |

#### Encryption at Rest

| Data Store | Encryption Method | Key Management |
|------------|-------------------|----------------|
| PostgreSQL | AWS RDS TDE | AWS KMS |
| S3 Buckets | AES-256 | AWS S3-Managed |
| EBS Volumes | AWS EBS Encryption | AWS KMS |
| Backups | GPG + AES-256 | Offline HSM |
| Application Logs | None required | N/A |

---

## 2. Penetration Testing Plan

### 2.1 Scope Definition

#### In-Scope

| Component | URL/IP | Testing Allowed |
|-----------|--------|-----------------|
| Production API | https://api.mockupaws.com | No (use staging) |
| Staging API | https://staging-api.mockupaws.com | Yes |
| Frontend App | https://app.mockupaws.com | Yes (staging) |
| Admin Panel | https://admin.mockupaws.com | Yes (staging) |
| Database | Internal | No (use test instance) |

#### Out-of-Scope

- Physical security
- Social engineering
- DoS/DDoS attacks
- Third-party infrastructure (AWS, Cloudflare)
- Employee personal devices

### 2.2 Test Cases

#### SQL Injection Tests

```python
# Test ID: SQL-001
# Objective: Test for SQL injection in scenario endpoints
# Method: Union-based injection

test_payloads = [
    "' OR '1'='1",
    "'; DROP TABLE scenarios; --",
    "' UNION SELECT username,password FROM users --",
    "1 AND 1=1",
    "1 AND 1=2",
    "1' ORDER BY 1--",
    "1' ORDER BY 100--",
    "-1' UNION SELECT null,null,null,null--",
]

# Endpoints to test
endpoints = [
    "/api/v1/scenarios/{id}",
    "/api/v1/scenarios?status={payload}",
    "/api/v1/scenarios?region={payload}",
    "/api/v1/ingest",
]
```

#### XSS (Cross-Site Scripting) Tests

```python
# Test ID: XSS-001 to XSS-003
# Types: Reflected, Stored, DOM-based

xss_payloads = [
    # Basic script injection
    "<script>alert('XSS')</script>",
    # Image onerror
    "<img src=x onerror=alert('XSS')>",
    # SVG injection
    "<svg onload=alert('XSS')>",
    # Event handler
    "\" onfocus=alert('XSS') autofocus=\"",
    # JavaScript protocol
    "javascript:alert('XSS')",
    # Template injection
    "{{7*7}}",
    "${7*7}",
    # HTML5 vectors
    "<body onpageshow=alert('XSS')>",
    "<marquee onstart=alert('XSS')>",
    # Polyglot
    "';alert(String.fromCharCode(88,83,83))//';alert(String.fromCharCode(88,83,83))//\";",
]

# Test locations
# 1. Scenario name (stored)
# 2. Log message preview (stored)
# 3. Error messages (reflected)
# 4. Search parameters (reflected)
```

#### CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery) Tests

```python
# Test ID: CSRF-001
# Objective: Verify CSRF protection on state-changing operations

# Test approach:
# 1. Create malicious HTML page
malicious_form = """
<form action="https://staging-api.mockupaws.com/api/v1/scenarios" method="POST" id="csrf-form">
    <input type="hidden" name="name" value="CSRF-Test">
    <input type="hidden" name="description" value="CSRF vulnerability test">
</form>
<script>document.getElementById('csrf-form').submit();</script>
"""

# 2. Trick authenticated user into visiting page
# 3. Check if scenario was created without proper token

# Expected: Request should fail without valid CSRF token
```

#### Authentication Bypass Tests

```python
# Test ID: AUTH-001 to AUTH-010

auth_tests = [
    {
        "id": "AUTH-001",
        "name": "JWT Algorithm Confusion",
        "method": "Change alg to 'none' in JWT header",
        "expected": "401 Unauthorized"
    },
    {
        "id": "AUTH-002",
        "name": "JWT Key Confusion (RS256 to HS256)",
        "method": "Sign token with public key as HMAC secret",
        "expected": "401 Unauthorized"
    },
    {
        "id": "AUTH-003",
        "name": "Token Expiration Bypass",
        "method": "Send expired token",
        "expected": "401 Unauthorized"
    },
    {
        "id": "AUTH-004",
        "name": "API Key Enumeration",
        "method": "Brute force API key prefixes",
        "expected": "Rate limited, consistent timing"
    },
    {
        "id": "AUTH-005",
        "name": "Session Fixation",
        "method": "Attempt to reuse old session token",
        "expected": "401 Unauthorized"
    },
    {
        "id": "AUTH-006",
        "name": "Password Brute Force",
        "method": "Attempt common passwords",
        "expected": "Account lockout after N attempts"
    },
    {
        "id": "AUTH-007",
        "name": "OAuth State Parameter",
        "method": "Missing/invalid state parameter",
        "expected": "400 Bad Request"
    },
    {
        "id": "AUTH-008",
        "name": "Privilege Escalation",
        "method": "Modify JWT payload to add admin role",
        "expected": "401 Unauthorized (signature invalid)"
    },
    {
        "id": "AUTH-009",
        "name": "Token Replay",
        "method": "Replay captured token from different IP",
        "expected": "Behavior depends on policy"
    },
    {
        "id": "AUTH-010",
        "name": "Weak Password Policy",
        "method": "Register with weak passwords",
        "expected": "Password rejected if < 8 chars or no complexity"
    },
]
```

#### Business Logic Tests

```python
# Test ID: LOGIC-001 to LOGIC-005

logic_tests = [
    {
        "id": "LOGIC-001",
        "name": "Scenario State Manipulation",
        "test": "Try to transition from draft to archived directly",
        "expected": "Validation error"
    },
    {
        "id": "LOGIC-002",
        "name": "Cost Calculation Manipulation",
        "test": "Inject negative values in metrics",
        "expected": "Validation error or absolute value"
    },
    {
        "id": "LOGIC-003",
        "name": "Race Condition - Double Spending",
        "test": "Simultaneous scenario starts",
        "expected": "Only one succeeds"
    },
    {
        "id": "LOGIC-004",
        "name": "Report Generation Abuse",
        "test": "Request multiple reports simultaneously",
        "expected": "Rate limited"
    },
    {
        "id": "LOGIC-005",
        "name": "Data Export Authorization",
        "test": "Export other user's scenario data",
        "expected": "403 Forbidden"
    },
]
```

### 2.3 Recommended Tools

#### Automated Scanning Tools

| Tool | Purpose | Usage |
|------|---------|-------|
| **OWASP ZAP** | Web vulnerability scanner | `zap-full-scan.py -t https://staging.mockupaws.com` |
| **Burp Suite Pro** | Web proxy and scanner | Manual testing + automated crawl |
| **sqlmap** | SQL injection detection | `sqlmap -u "https://api.mockupaws.com/scenarios?id=1"` |
| **Nikto** | Web server scanner | `nikto -h https://staging.mockupaws.com` |
| **Nuclei** | Fast vulnerability scanner | `nuclei -u https://staging.mockupaws.com` |

#### Static Analysis Tools

| Tool | Language | Usage |
|------|----------|-------|
| **Bandit** | Python | `bandit -r src/` |
| **Semgrep** | Multi | `semgrep --config=auto src/` |
| **ESLint Security** | JavaScript | `eslint --ext .ts,.tsx src/` |
| **SonarQube** | Multi | Full codebase analysis |
| **Trivy** | Docker/Infra | `trivy fs --scanners vuln,secret,config .` |

#### Manual Testing Tools

| Tool | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| **Postman** | API testing and fuzzing |
| **JWT.io** | JWT token analysis |
| **CyberChef** | Data encoding/decoding |
| **Wireshark** | Network traffic analysis |
| **Browser DevTools** | Frontend security testing |

---

## 3. Compliance Review

### 3.1 GDPR Compliance Checklist

#### Lawful Basis and Transparency

| Requirement | Status | Evidence |
|-------------|--------|----------|
| Privacy Policy Published | ⬜ | Document required |
| Terms of Service Published | ⬜ | Document required |
| Cookie Consent Implemented | ⬜ | Frontend required |
| Data Processing Agreement | ⬜ | For sub-processors |

#### Data Subject Rights

| Right | Implementation | Status |
|-------|----------------|--------|
| **Right to Access** | `/api/v1/user/data-export` endpoint | ⬜ |
| **Right to Rectification** | User profile update API | ⬜ |
| **Right to Erasure** | Account deletion with cascade | ⬜ |
| **Right to Restrict Processing** | Soft delete option | ⬜ |
| **Right to Data Portability** | JSON/CSV export | ⬜ |
| **Right to Object** | Marketing opt-out | ⬜ |
| **Right to be Informed** | Data collection notices | ⬜ |

#### Data Retention and Minimization

```python
# GDPR Data Retention Policy
gdpr_retention_policies = {
    "user_personal_data": {
        "retention_period": "7 years after account closure",
        "legal_basis": "Legal obligation (tax records)",
        "anonymization_after": "7 years"
    },
    "scenario_logs": {
        "retention_period": "1 year",
        "legal_basis": "Legitimate interest",
        "can_contain_pii": True,
        "auto_purge": True
    },
    "audit_logs": {
        "retention_period": "7 years",
        "legal_basis": "Legal obligation (security)",
        "immutable": True
    },
    "api_access_logs": {
        "retention_period": "90 days",
        "legal_basis": "Legitimate interest",
        "anonymize_ips": True
    }
}
```

#### GDPR Technical Checklist

- [ ] Pseudonymization of user data where possible
- [ ] Encryption of personal data at rest and in transit
- [ ] Breach notification procedure (72 hours)
- [ ] Privacy by design implementation
- [ ] Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)
- [ ] Records of processing activities
- [ ] DPO appointment (if required)

### 3.2 SOC 2 Readiness Assessment

#### SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria

| Criteria | Control Objective | Current State | Gap |
|----------|-------------------|---------------|-----|
| **Security** | Protect system from unauthorized access | Partial | Medium |
| **Availability** | System available for operation | Partial | Low |
| **Processing Integrity** | Complete, valid, accurate, timely processing | Partial | Medium |
| **Confidentiality** | Protect confidential information | Partial | Medium |
| **Privacy** | Collect, use, retain, disclose personal info | Partial | High |

#### Security Controls Mapping

```
SOC 2 CC6.1 - Logical Access Security
├── User authentication (JWT + API Keys) ✅
├── Password policies ⬜
├── Access review procedures ⬜
└── Least privilege enforcement ⬜

SOC 2 CC6.2 - Access Removal
├── Automated de-provisioning ⬜
├── Access revocation on termination ⬜
└── Regular access reviews ⬜

SOC 2 CC6.3 - Access Approvals
├── Access request workflow ⬜
├── Manager approval required ⬜
└── Documentation of access grants ⬜

SOC 2 CC6.6 - Encryption
├── Encryption in transit (TLS 1.3) ✅
├── Encryption at rest ⬜
└── Key management ⬜

SOC 2 CC7.2 - System Monitoring
├── Audit logging ⬜
├── Log monitoring ⬜
├── Alerting on anomalies ⬜
└── Log retention ⬜
```

#### SOC 2 Readiness Roadmap

| Phase | Timeline | Activities |
|-------|----------|------------|
| **Phase 1: Documentation** | Weeks 1-4 | Policy creation, control documentation |
| **Phase 2: Implementation** | Weeks 5-12 | Control implementation, tool deployment |
| **Phase 3: Evidence Collection** | Weeks 13-16 | 3 months of evidence collection |
| **Phase 4: Audit** | Week 17 | External auditor engagement |

---

## 4. Remediation Plan

### 4.1 Severity Classification

| Severity | CVSS Score | Response Time | SLA |
|----------|------------|---------------|-----|
| **Critical** | 9.0-10.0 | 24 hours | Fix within 1 week |
| **High** | 7.0-8.9 | 48 hours | Fix within 2 weeks |
| **Medium** | 4.0-6.9 | 1 week | Fix within 1 month |
| **Low** | 0.1-3.9 | 2 weeks | Fix within 3 months |
| **Informational** | 0.0 | N/A | Document |

### 4.2 Remediation Template

```markdown
## Vulnerability Report Template

### VULN-XXX: [Title]

**Severity:** [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
**Category:** [OWASP Category]
**Component:** [Backend/Frontend/Infrastructure]
**Discovered:** [Date]
**Reporter:** [Name]

#### Description
[Detailed description of the vulnerability]

#### Impact
[What could happen if exploited]

#### Steps to Reproduce
1. Step one
2. Step two
3. Step three

#### Evidence
[Code snippets, screenshots, request/response]

#### Recommended Fix
[Specific remediation guidance]

#### Verification
[How to verify the fix is effective]

#### Status
- [ ] Confirmed
- [ ] Fix in Progress
- [ ] Fix Deployed
- [ ] Verified
```

---

## 5. Audit Schedule

### Week 1: Preparation

| Day | Activity | Owner |
|-----|----------|-------|
| 1 | Kickoff meeting, scope finalization | Security Lead |
| 2 | Environment setup, tool installation | Security Team |
| 3 | Documentation review, test cases prep | Security Team |
| 4 | Start automated scanning | Security Team |
| 5 | Automated scan analysis | Security Team |

### Week 2-3: Manual Testing

| Activity | Duration | Owner |
|----------|----------|-------|
| SQL Injection Testing | 2 days | Pen Tester |
| XSS Testing | 2 days | Pen Tester |
| Authentication Testing | 2 days | Pen Tester |
| Business Logic Testing | 2 days | Pen Tester |
| API Security Testing | 2 days | Pen Tester |
| Infrastructure Testing | 2 days | Pen Tester |

### Week 4: Remediation & Verification

| Day | Activity | Owner |
|-----|----------|-------|
| 1 | Final report delivery | Security Team |
| 2-5 | Critical/High remediation | Dev Team |
| 6 | Remediation verification | Security Team |
| 7 | Sign-off | Security Lead |

---

## Appendix A: Security Testing Tools Setup

### OWASP ZAP Configuration

```bash
# Install OWASP ZAP
docker pull owasp/zap2docker-stable

# Full scan
docker run -v $(pwd):/zap/wrk/:rw \
  owasp/zap2docker-stable zap-full-scan.py \
  -t https://staging-api.mockupaws.com \
  -g gen.conf \
  -r zap-report.html

# API scan (for OpenAPI)
docker run -v $(pwd):/zap/wrk/:rw \
  owasp/zap2docker-stable zap-api-scan.py \
  -t https://staging-api.mockupaws.com/openapi.json \
  -f openapi \
  -r zap-api-report.html
```

### Burp Suite Configuration

```
1. Set up upstream proxy for certificate pinning bypass
2. Import OpenAPI specification
3. Configure scan scope:
   - Include: https://staging-api.mockupaws.com/*
   - Exclude: https://staging-api.mockupaws.com/health
4. Set authentication:
   - Token location: Header
   - Header name: Authorization
   - Token prefix: Bearer
5. Run crawl and audit
```

### CI/CD Security Integration

```yaml
# .github/workflows/security-scan.yml
name: Security Scan

on:
  push:
    branches: [main, develop]
  pull_request:
    branches: [main]
  schedule:
    - cron: '0 0 * * 0'  # Weekly

jobs:
  dependency-check:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
      
      - name: Python Dependency Audit
        run: |
          pip install pip-audit
          pip-audit --requirement requirements.txt
      
      - name: Node.js Dependency Audit
        run: |
          cd frontend
          npm audit --audit-level=moderate
      
      - name: Secret Scan
        uses: trufflesecurity/trufflehog@main
        with:
          path: ./
          base: main
          head: HEAD

  sast:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
      
      - name: Bandit Scan
        run: |
          pip install bandit
          bandit -r src/ -f json -o bandit-report.json
      
      - name: Semgrep Scan
        uses: returntocorp/semgrep-action@v1
        with:
          config: >-
            p/security-audit
            p/owasp-top-ten
            p/cwe-top-25
```

---

*Document Version: 1.0.0-Draft*  
*Last Updated: 2026-04-07*  
*Classification: Internal - Confidential*  
*Owner: @spec-architect*